« BusySync reaches 2,500 users | Main | BusySync wins Macworld Best of Show Award! »

January 13, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834c045d269e200e54fddb3a28833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference BusyMac announces BusySync 2.0: Sync iCal with Google Calendar:

Comments

Hi John (& Dave)

That's amazing news!!! I'll finally have an easy iCal solution to network sync AND Google cal sync in 1 app.

Roll on the address book sync next. ;)

I have one little query though...
It is a great app but isn't $24.95 per computer a high price for 'family' use? This is what initially put me off buying BusySync until MacZot had a special offer on it.

It's the 'per computer' charge that I have an issue with really - I think it may make it more appealing if there was a certain fee for a location/group (like $20 for instance) and then you could buy individual user/computer licenses (for $5 each).

I like 1password's licence structure - it's one licence per user (not computer) so you can use 1password on your laptop AND your desktop Mac as it's still the same user.

(I'm glad I have two 1.5 licences already though) :)

Keep up the good work!

This is awesome and what I was waiting for, Spanning sync has the over priced app that only syncs with Gcal. I can't wait until 2.0 is out in the wild.

What's the advantage of BusySync vs. publishing my iCal events to Google Calendar???

Just the bidirectional updating? (Don't get me wrong. That might be enough.)

Currently, I use Google Calendar (without iCal) because I LOVE getting SMS reminders and the ability to add an event to G Cal via text message.

However, I was thinking of switching to Apple iCal as my main calendar app so that I could add new events via my iPod touch -- while publishing iCal events to G Cal so that I still get my text message reminders. The downfall of this setup is that I would lose the ability to add new events via text message.

I've been googling around trying to find a better price ever since learning about BusyMac a few days ago. Unfortunately, I missed the MacZot pricing referred to above.

All the new features sound great for those who need them, but I am interested only in syncing iCal across a LAN. It's mostly for my wife and me, but I'd also like to include the surplus laptop I use when sitting around the house. It would also be nice to put it on my kids' computer, for read-only purposes.

Saw in some old Google group comments that you were considering a $50 LAN license. Wish you had implemented something like that. Right now, it would be $80 for my purposes (soon to be $100). Good as your product sounds, that won't fit in our budget.

Question: Can I sync with multiple Google Calendars? For example, sync all for sharing with family, but also sync just one of my calendars with an interest group (Soccer club, ...) in a different google calendar and account?

Craig, Peter, and William,
Your questions are answered in the FAQ here:
http://www.busymac.com/faqs.html

This is *awesome* news, guys!

Rock on, and whenever you're ready to move your syncing experience to, say, iTunes, I'll be ready to buy again!

(I'd buy more BusySyncs, too, but I only have two machines ;)


To the person complaining about the price - come on, how cheap are you?? Are these guys who've written this obliged to live on dust?

Secondly - have you considered using Google Calendar at your second machine via the browser, and then syncing back to iCal on the original machine? Only one licence required. (Durr.)

To be honest this actually sounds *inexpensive* for what it does.

Hey, I wish them luck. But, for what it's worth, I'm really happy with SpanningSync. (And I don't think they're overpriced!) Excellent communication with the developers when Leopard broke some sync stuff, and great responsiveness as I was pushing the envelope. But now I have Gcal (for my secretary on Windows) to iCal to my handheld Palm Treo running where I can create appointments in any of the three environments and have them propagate to the other two.

I don't mind spending money when I get support like that. I hope BusySync is planning the same level of support... competition is good!

I'm currently using Plaxo and i have to say that's it had a very poor reliability.
I'll be willing to pay for your app if reliability is good !

Simple case : if edit ONE recurrent event in iCal, will it correctly update that one event in GCal ?

Please say yes, I want to beta test, I want to uninstall Plaxo, I want to buy your Busysync !

Hello I am make a quick enquiry about idea behind version 2.0

How does sync with Google work, Spanning Sync have server and subscription model which I do not like.

The payment is a one off cost, and are you syncing directly with google.

Regards
Roland

BusySync is sold as a one-time fee, there is no subscription fee, and it syncs directly with Google Calendar.

My main problem with Spanning Sync is that it doesn't preserve event alarms/notifications between iCal and GCal. Does the 2.0 support this? ie, if I create a Gcal event with an alarm, will that alarm still appear in iCal (and vice-versa)?

Yes, BusySync 2.0 supports syncing alarms with Google Calendar. You'll be able to check out the public beta soon. And you can let us know if it works as desired.

Is there the chance that a future feature could be extending BusySync to include Address Book synching via Bonjour and Google much the way iCal/gCal is supported?

Yes, we plan to offer Address Book syncing via Bonjour and with Google Contacts in the future.

Happy user of BusySync, I'd love to know if there's anything new regarding Address Book syncing so far?

Address Book sync would rock!

> Yes, we plan to offer Address Book syncing
> with Google Contacts in the future.

Great! Look forward to this!

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment